Land Rover Discovery 2016 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 25 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 283 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is larger. Land Rover Discovery is 47 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 16 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2406 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Discovery has 497 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Land Rover Discovery uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Land Rover Discovery can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |