Land Rover Discovery 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 81 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Discovery is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 258 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2406 litres | 2030 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 376 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`200 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 41 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |