Land Rover Discovery 2016 vs Audi Q7 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 14 HP less power than Audi Q7, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1570 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 4 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 258 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2406 litres | 1955 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 512 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 451 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi Q7. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`940 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q7 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |