Land Rover Discovery 2016 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 162 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 189 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 12.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Discovery is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1231 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1231 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2406 litres | 1790 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 616 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Discovery can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |