Land Rover Discovery 1990 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Discovery is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.9 | 2.5 - 5.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 - 185 HP | 116 - 237 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 314 NM | 278 - 472 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 20.6 seconds | 8.2 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 16.4 | 9.9 - 17.9 | |
|
Land Rover Discovery petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Land Rover Discovery equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 1136 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | 2255 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery has 154 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The Jeep Grand Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`720 | ~ 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |