Land Rover Discovery 2014 vs Volvo XC90 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Discovery is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo XC90 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 - 340 HP | 190 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 600 NM | 350 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 10.7 seconds | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 12.0 | 2.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Land Rover Discovery petrol engines consumes on average 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Land Rover Discovery equipped with diesel engines consume 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1260 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery has 645 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.45 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.05 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Discovery can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |