Land Rover Discovery 2014 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Discovery is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-9 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 3.7 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Land Rover Discovery is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 - 340 HP | 273 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 600 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 10.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 12.0 | 11.3 | |
|
Land Rover Discovery petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.73 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1260 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery has 773 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda CX-9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.45 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |