Land Rover Discovery Sport 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 6.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`660 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |