Land Rover Discovery Sport 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 27 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1877 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Discovery Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`660 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`874 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 786 kg | 750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |