Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 71 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery Sport could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 963 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery Sport has 348 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |