Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 94 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 169 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 56 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 963 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery Sport has 486 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 35 000 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |