Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 963 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery Sport has 457 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Land Rover Discovery Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`590 | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |