Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery Sport could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 650 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Land Rover Discovery Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |