Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery Sport could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |