Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery Sport could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery Sport consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 503 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`600 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`863 kg | 1`495 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 737 kg | 645 kg | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Land Rover Discovery Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |