Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 135 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Discovery Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 2`350 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |