Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Discovery Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1877 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Discovery Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`600 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`854 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 746 kg | 810 kg | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |