Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Land Rover Discovery Sport is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.7 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.0 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
Land Rover Discovery Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Land Rover Discovery Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`765 | ~ 2`401 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 15 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |