Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 430 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.7 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.0 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Land Rover Discovery Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 211 - 212 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1698 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`625 kg | ~ 2`401 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`858 kg | ~ 1`827 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 767 kg | ~ 574 kg | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Land Rover Discovery Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |