Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 430 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.7 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.0 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Land Rover Discovery Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 211 - 212 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1698 litres | 1982 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery Sport is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Discovery Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`625 kg | ~ 2`195 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`858 kg | ~ 1`571 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 767 kg | ~ 624 kg | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Land Rover Discovery Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |