Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 vs Audi Q5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi Q5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 143 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 320 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.7 seconds | 5.9 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.0 | 4.8 - 8.5 | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q5. On average, Land Rover Discovery Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`765 | ~ 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q5 has
| |