Land Rover Defender 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 71 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 40 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |