Land Rover Defender 1998 vs Jeep Wrangler 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 296 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 5 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 72 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler 1996 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Defender and Jeep Wrangler are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1565 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 1`975 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |