Land Rover Defender 1998 vs Chevrolet Suburban 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 108 HP less power than Chevrolet Suburban, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Chevrolet Suburban. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 117 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 5.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Defender is 169 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Suburban, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3720 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Chevrolet Suburban has
| |