Land Rover Defender 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Defender consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Defender consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 38 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |