Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 51 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 87 litres | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 2.02 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 84 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |