Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 41 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 17 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 87 litres | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 2.02 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 93 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |