Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 96 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 2.02 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 87 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1940 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Commander has
| |