Land Rover Defender 1991 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 253 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender engine produces 72 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 18.1 | 14.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 440 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 1.90 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |