Land Rover Defender 1991 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 253 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 18.1 | 15.6 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 440 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 18 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Defender can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |