Land Rover Defender 1991 vs Nissan Patrol 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 253 NM | 323 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 22 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Nissan Patrol. Despite less power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 18.1 | 10.8 | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 7.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 1095 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 440 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 1.84 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Patrol, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1374 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |