Land Rover Defender 1992 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 12.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 1.88 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |