Land Rover Defender 1992 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 11.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 1.86 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |