Land Rover Defender 1992 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 113 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender engine produces 23 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 11.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
710 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Defender engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 2.04 m | 1.82 m | |
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 22 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |