Land Rover Defender 1992 vs Land Rover Defender 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Defender 1998 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender 1992 engine produces 9 HP less power than Land Rover Defender 1998, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Land Rover Defender 1998. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender 1992 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Defender 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Defender 1992 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender 1992 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Defender 1992 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Defender 1992 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Defender 1998 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 2.08 m | |
| Land Rover Defender 1992 is 72 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Defender 1992 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender 1992 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |