Land Rover Defender 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 1.86 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |