Land Rover Defender 1991 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.6 Petrol | |
Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Isuzu Rodeo) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 203 NM | 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 24 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Land Rover Defender engine produces 34 HP less power than Isuzu Rodeo, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 83 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 2.04 m | 1.66 m | |
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 12 cm longer than the Isuzu Rodeo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 38 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`066 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |