Land Rover Defender 2002 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda CR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 110 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Defender consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Defender consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Defender engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 2.08 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 37 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 2.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`500 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |