Land Rover Defender 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender engine produces 14 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Defender consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 540 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Defender consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Defender engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 2.08 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 9 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 40 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 2.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |