Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 158 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Land Rover Defender engine produces 36 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.9 | |
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
630 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
Land Rover Defender is 14 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 21 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`688 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 26 000 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |