Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Lexus RX 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 283 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
Land Rover Defender engine produces 82 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 77 NM more than Lexus RX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.2 | |
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
630 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 2.03 m | 1.68 m | |
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 10 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 35 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 439 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2130 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.4 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`380 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 26 000 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Lexus RX has
| |