Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 204 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 15.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 2.03 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 15 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |