Land Rover Defender 2011 vs Toyota Highlander 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 188 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 NM | 252 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 66 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 109 NM more than Toyota Highlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.9 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.73 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 4310 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 4310 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 5.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |