Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan X-Trail) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Defender is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Defender engine produces 35 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 270 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 51 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 24 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 972 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2277 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Defender has 562 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 436 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 2.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 58 000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |