Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan X-Trail) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Defender is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Defender engine produces 84 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 340 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Defender consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Defender consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 51 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 24 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 231 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 231 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2233 litres | 1841 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 392 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 2.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 56 400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |