Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 426 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Defender is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Defender engine produces 168 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 16.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 293 mm (11.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.81 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 972 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2277 litres | 2047 litres | |
| Land Rover Defender has 132 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`230 kg | 2`495 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`336 kg | 1`994 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 894 kg | 501 kg | |
| Land Rover Defender load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 44 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 58 000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |