Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 245 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 354 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 291 mm (11.5 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 23 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 16 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 397 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1563 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Land Rover Defender has 80 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`025 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`193 kg | 1`559 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 807 kg | 466 kg | |
| Land Rover Defender load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 42 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Defender is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Defender scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 51 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |