Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Jeep Wrangler 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 40 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, but torque is 20 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Land Rover Defender consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Land Rover Defender over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 291 mm (11.5 inches) | 260 mm (10.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.87 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Wrangler, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 397 litres | 203 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1563 litres | 508 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Wrangler may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 1055 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`970 kg | 2`404 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`156 kg | 1`920 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 814 kg | 484 kg | |
| Land Rover Defender load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem more than Jeep Wrangler. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Defender scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Wrangler is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Defender scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 51 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |