Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 50 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Defender might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 37 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 397 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1563 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Land Rover Defender has 153 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.7 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`970 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Defender scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 67 200 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |