Land Rover Defender 2019 vs BMW X1 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 10 HP more power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 30 NM more than BMW X1. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 4.7 | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.60 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 12 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 38 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 397 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1563 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Land Rover Defender has 108 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 13 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW X1, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`970 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`156 kg | 1`550 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 814 kg | 580 kg | |
| Land Rover Defender load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than BMW X1. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 58 800 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
BMW X1 has
| |