Land Rover Defender 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.9 | 2.8 - 4.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 - 182 HP | 91 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 - 314 NM | 188 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 - 18.6 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 10.1 | 11.2 - 17.8 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 2.01 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 96 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 832 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`993 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |