Land Rover Defender 1996 vs Land Rover Defender 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.9 | 2.5 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 - 182 HP | 86 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 - 314 NM | 203 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 - 18.6 seconds | 14.7 - 24 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 10.1 | 10.1 - 18.1 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender 1991. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 2.01 m | 2.05 m | |
| Land Rover Defender 1996 is 72 cm shorter than the Land Rover Defender 1991, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Defender 1996 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender 1996 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender 1991, which means Land Rover Defender 1996 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |